"How Do we Feed the Teachers?" - By Melissa Kennedy
Opinion
article
7/7/08
‘How
do we feed the teachers?’
‘If
you don’t feed the teachers they eat the students.’ Perhaps. But more to the
point they will eat each other, the administrators or just leave the dinner
table altogether for a higher paid, less stressful job.
So
what do we do about it? It makes sense to ask the teachers themselves. Too often though teachers are not asked for
solutions rather they are blamed for problems in education. It is too
simplistic to force one group to shoulder such a burden. Many people have a
stake in education; teachers, politicians, parents, students, business people,
administrators, corporations; and all should share in the responsibility for
improving it.
As
a community we need to think carefully about what motivates someone to be a
teacher, stay in teaching and create quality teaching and learning experiences.
A vibrant empowered teaching profession will attract more lie minded people to
it. Continued high quality professional learning opportunities are important in
retaining effective teachers. Without such support teachers lose heart and
start to feel stagnant. A stagnant teacher does not innovate; she merely
survives to the detriment of herself and her students.
Recently
I had the good fortune to participate in the Boise State Writing Project
Invitational Summer Institute. It is here that I learned of some practical ways
we can create more professional learning opportunities for teachers, helping
them to be innovative and engaged in teaching and learning. According to the
NWP website, ‘The summer institute is at the core of NWP's
model of "teachers teaching teachers.’
The
Boise State Writing Project is run under the auspices of the National Writing
Project, which believes that ‘Writing is essential to success
in school and the workplace.’ The aim of the N.W.P. is to assist
‘Through NWP's professional learning programs, teachers in all subject areas and all grade levels learn new strategies to help their students become accomplished writers and learners.’
The National Writing Project relies on a close
connection between university education faculties and teachers. The name Boise State Writing Project is affiliated with Boise
State University. Writing Projects are located at different sites across the
U.S. and two international sites in Malta and Hong Kong. This local approach
enables the Summer Institute and other courses to be adapted to the needs of
the local teaching climate. This is an excellent idea as it is personal,
relevant and immediate for teachers and therefore their students.
Professor Jeffrey Wilhelm is the motivating force
behind the Boise State Writing Project. His last National Writing Project home
was in Maine. There, as in Boise, he showed strong leadership skills to empower
a teaching community that fosters its own and promotes change.
I’ve seen first hand the power of this program to
motivate teachers who feel disempowered by the ‘No Child Left Behind’
legislation. The National Writing Project motivates them to see the
possibilities for growth in their classroom and communities. It encourages them
to think of themselves less as victims of the latest government whim and more
as agents of change working within the system to provide the best educational
opportunities for their students.
According to the U.S. Department of Education’s
website
‘No Child Left Behind is based on stronger accountability for results, more freedom for states and communities, proven education methods, and more choices for parents.’
On the surface this looks like good legislation,
which supports the students and teachers in the best possible way. In practice
extracts such as the following show cracks in the façade.
‘No Child Left Behind puts emphasis on determining which educational programs and practices have been proven effective through rigorous scientific research. Federal funding is targeted to support these programs and teaching methods that work to improve student learning and achievement.’
These cracks show up in how this
legislation is implemented. There are two main crevices- prescriptive teaching
programs and standardised testing. Many teachers are forced to use prescriptive
programs to teach such skills as reading. They are so prescriptive that the
teacher must show ‘fidelity’ to the program, which means doing such things as
reading scripted explanations to students word-for-word. ‘Fidelity’ is a
concept that appears to have been appropriated by textbook companies,
administrators and legislators to guilt teachers into toeing the line.
These teachers work in school districts
in which administrators bought such programs because the government said they
were not meeting standards and in order to receive continued financial support
they need to buy the programs the government says will fix their problems.
This, of course, backfires because it ignores the relationship aspect of
teaching, the unique qualities of the local school community and shows a lack
of trust in teachers and students. Instead the government tries to wallpaper
over the issues with a one size fits all panacea.
Standardised testing is another
issue that disturbs teachers in the US. The type of testing that operates here
is very limiting and frequently involves multiple-choice tests and narrow
writing tasks. With the ‘No Child Left Behind’ legislation the government
needed to make comparisons across a highly decentralised education system. To a
certain extent I can understand the government’s logic on this point. In
Australia the federal government recently instituted a form of national testing
called the National Assessment Program- Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN).
Ironically Australia has no national curriculum but it now has national
testing!
Unlike the U.S. though our funding
for schools is not linked to performance in the standardised tests. This part of
the equation is the one that disturbs me. It seems that the vast majority of
cognitive scientists and the average soul on the street agree that academic
achievement and indeed intelligence cannot be measured by a series of
standardised tests. Yet this is what the U.S. government chooses as the main
measure of academic achievement. As a teacher working in such a system it is
easy to think that there is no hope and you may as well teach to the test and
ignore all you know about effective teaching practice.
Thankfully organisations such as
the National Writing Project empower teachers to work within this difficult
political framework to show them it is possible to teach well, to teach with an
inquiry based approach, to value the relationship aspects of learning and still
ensure your students pass their standardised tests.
At the Boise State Writing Project
they achieve this through a year long program of events. The main component is
a five-week program in which participants present an action research project,
deliver a learning autobiography in a creative way, discuss professional texts,
develop their own writing skills and find a voice for social change in their
community. It is an intensive and rewarding program. Coaches, previous NWP
Summer Institute participants, support the teachers throughout the program
offering assistance on all aspects of the course. Teachers also receive support
from other participants in reading groups, where you discuss professional
literature and writing groups, where you workshop each other’s writing efforts.
For their efforts over the year
teachers receive 6 credit points at Boise State University which they may use
towards gaining a Masters Degree. This acts as an incentive to undertake
further courses. Teachers are also welcomed into a supportive network of
like-minded educators who encourage each other to experiment with new ideas in
the classroom and become invigorated practitioners.
The political and educational
context in Idaho is very different from that in New South Wales. Despite our
differences we are all in the same game and we all benefit from enhancing our
professional learning opportunities. This is the power of the National Writing
Program. Its core principles are relevant to any teacher in any country. It
provides a rich and nurturing professional learning experience that heightens
teacher engagement and, in turn, attracts new people who want to be part of
such a dynamic profession. Thus creating a climate of renewal. In 2003 it was
estimated that there would be a shortage of 30 000 teachers by 2010 because of
retirements, teachers choosing to work overseas and/ or outside the profession
(Nelson, 9/10/03). Grassroots movements like the National Writing Project
provide ways to attract and retain more people in teaching.
New South Wales
teachers and students would benefit from a structured
professional learning program like the National Writing Project. Professor Wilhelm is coming to Australia next
July/August and is keen to lend a hand in any way he can. The US National Writing Project is funded by
the federal government to the tune of 24 million dollars in 2008. Without the
cooperation of universities and such funding we cannot hope to replicate such
programs. There are some steps we can take in this direction though. Professor
Wilhelm is working in Tasmania in the next few years to establish an Inquiry
Institute, an initiative of the National Writing Project. In New South Wales we
can start with the very active English Teacher’s Association and incorporate
some of the ideas from the US National Writing Project into the ETA’s
activities.
We could run short professional
learning courses of two to three days, for example an inquiry
workshop, a writing workshop and an action research workshop, which could lead
to participants presenting workshops at the annual New South Wales ETA
conference. In recent years there has been discussion about how difficult it is
to find teachers interested in presenting high quality, engaging workshops.
This is a perfect way to grow such teacher researchers and in turn they can be
models for others.
Successful trials of courses such as these and
more connections between universities and practicing teachers will strengthen
any efforts to secure funding from the federal government to establish a
National Writing Program in Australia. Professor Wilhelm and the staff of the National Writing Program are keen
to spread the word about how powerful learning can be if we all work together
to engage and inspire. I believe we need
to listen and be ready to act.
References:
The Boise State Writing Project http://english.boisestate.edu/bswp/ (accessed 7/7/08)
Cloud, John ‘Inside the New SAT test’ (19/10/2003) on http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101031027-524393,00.html (accessed 7/7/08)
‘Detailed Information on the National Writing Project’ (Fall, 2004) on http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/expectmore/detail/10002110.2004.html (accessed 7/7/08)
The Educational Testing Service http://www.ets.org/portal/site/ets/menuitem.3a88fea28f42ada7c6ce5a10c3921509/?vgnextoid=85b65784623f4010VgnVCM10000022f95190RCRD (accessed 7/7/08)
Murray, Charles ‘Abolish the SAT’ (July/Aug 2007) on http://www.american.com/archive/2007/july-august-magazine-contents/abolish-the-sat (accessed 7/7/08)
NAPLAN www.naplan.edu.au (accessed 7/7/08)
The National Writing Project www.nwp.org (accessed 7/7/08)
Nelson, Brendan (9 October 2003) Media Release ‘Australia’s Teachers- Australia’s Future’ on http://www.dest.gov.au/Ministers/Media/Nelson/2003/10/n475091003.asp (accessed 7/7/08)
Shea, Christopher (July 4 2004) ‘What Does the SAT test?’ on http://www.boston.com/news/education/k_12/articles/2004/07/04/the_sat_tests/ (accessed 7/7/08)
U.S. Department of Education Website http://www.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/4pillars.html
(accessed 7/7/08)
